Back to Journals » Nature and Science of Sleep » Volume 16

Characterisation of Symptom and Polysomnographic Profiles Associated with Cardiovascular Risk in a Sleep Clinic Population with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Authors Kemp E, Sutherland K , Bin YS , Chan ASL , Dissanayake H, Yee BJ, Kairaitis K, Wheatley JR, de Chazal P, Piper AJ, Cistulli PA

Received 31 December 2023

Accepted for publication 27 April 2024

Published 6 May 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 461—471

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S453259

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Ahmed BaHammam



Emily Kemp,1 Kate Sutherland,1– 3 Yu Sun Bin,2,3 Andrew SL Chan,1– 3 Hasthi Dissanayake,2,3 Brendon J Yee,2– 5 Kristina Kairaitis,2,3,6,7 John Robert Wheatley,2,3,6,7 Philip de Chazal,2,8 Amanda J Piper,2,4 Peter A Cistulli1– 3 On behalf of the Sydney Sleep Biobank Investigators

1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia; 2Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 3Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 4Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 5Centre for Integrated Research and Understanding of Sleep (CIRUS), Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, NSW, Australia; 6Ludwig Engel Centre for Respiratory Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, NSW, Australia; 7Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia; 8School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia

Correspondence: Peter A Cistulli, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Level 8A, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia, Tel +61 29463 2934, Fax +61 2 9463 2099, Email [email protected]

Aim: Recent data have identified specific symptom and polysomnographic profiles associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Our aim was to determine whether these profiles were present at diagnosis of OSA in patients with established CVD and in those with high cardiovascular risk. Participants in the Sydney Sleep Biobank (SSB) database, aged 30– 74 years, self-reported presence of CVD (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or heart failure). In those without established CVD, the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) estimated 10-year absolute CVD risk, categorised as “low” (< 6%), “intermediate” (6– 20%), or “high” (> 20%). Groups were compared on symptom and polysomnographic variables.
Results: 629 patients (68% male; mean age 54.3 years, SD 11.6; mean BMI 32.3 kg/m2, SD 8.2) were included. CVD was reported in 12.2%. A further 14.3% had a low risk FRS, 38.8% had an intermediate risk FRS, and 34.7% had a high risk FRS. Groups differed with respect to age, sex and BMI. OSA severity increased with established CVD and increasing FRS. The symptom of waking too early was more prevalent in the higher FRS groups (p=0.004). CVD and FRS groups differed on multiple polysomnographic variables; however, none of these differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI.
Conclusion: Higher CVD risk was associated with waking too early in patients with OSA. Polysomnographic variations between groups were explained by demographic differences. Further work is required to explore the influence of OSA phenotypic characteristics on susceptibility to CVD.

Keywords: obstructive sleep apnoea, cardiovascular disease

Introduction

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a highly prevalent sleep disorder estimated to affect nearly one billion people globally.1 Repetitive collapse of the pharyngeal airway promotes sympathetic activation, oxidative stress, inflammation, and mechanical strain on the heart, which mechanistically links OSA to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD).2

In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of OSA as a heterogenous disorder.3,4 Specific phenotypes have been identified,4–6 some of which have links to CVD. For example, an excessively sleepy symptom subtype has been linked to the development of CVD.7 Similarly, polysomnographic variables such as hypoxia,8,9 breathing disturbance during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep10 and presence of periodic limb movements8 may also predict cardiovascular outcomes over and above the apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI).

It is unknown whether these same phenotypes are evident at diagnosis of OSA in both those with established CVD and in individuals without CVD but with elevated CVD risk, as assessed by Framingham Risk Score.11 Our aims were firstly to characterise symptom and polysomnographic profiles that were associated with established CVD at diagnosis of OSA. Secondly, we aimed to see whether these same patterns were evident in those without CVD but with elevated CVD risk. We hypothesised that those with established CVD, and those with high CVD risk, would be more likely to be excessively sleepy, and display polysomnographic features such as hypoxia and more breathing disturbances in REM sleep.

Methods

Participants

The Sydney Sleep Biobank (SSB)12 prospectively recruits participants at three tertiary hospital sleep laboratories in Sydney, Australia (Royal North Shore Hospital, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Westmead Hospital). Participants were eligible for recruitment if they were aged over 18 years, could give informed consent, and were attending for overnight polysomnography at one of the three sites. The SSB protocol complies with the declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District (NSLHD) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) protocol number HREC/17/HAWKE/340, with site specific approval at all sites (Royal North Shore Hospital no. SSA/18/HAWKE/127, Westmead no. SSA/18/WMEAD/163, Royal Prince Alfred no. SSA/18/RPAH/470). SSB data collection occurred on the night preceding and morning after polysomnography and included demographic information, anthropometric data, detailed questionnaire data and biological samples. Participants did not have a pre-existing diagnosis of OSA. Data from participants in the SSB database as of 26 April 2022 who were aged 30–74, completed the required information for this analysis, and whose polysomnogram was diagnostic of OSA (AHI ≥ 5) were included.

Cardiovascular Disease

Participants were classified as having established CVD if they self-reported having ever been diagnosed with: 1) coronary artery disease (eg angina, myocardial infarction, heart attack, coronary artery stent, coronary artery bypass surgery); 2) cerebrovascular disease (eg stroke or transient ischaemic attack [TIA]); or 3) heart failure, in the medical history component of the SSB questionnaire. Otherwise, they were classified as not having CVD.

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment

In those without established CVD, the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for 10-year general CVD risk was calculated using the office-based, non-laboratory version (body mass index [BMI], instead of total and HDL Cholesterol) of the prediction model.11 Participants were restricted to ages 30–74 years, as the model is only validated for these age groups. Variables used to calculate FRS risk included: sex, age, systolic blood pressure (BP), BMI, use of anti-hypertensive medication, cigarette smoking, and history of diabetes; and was performed using a freely available Microsoft Excel spreadsheet calculator (https://framinghamheartstudy.org/fhs-risk-functions/cardiovascular-disease-10-year-risk/). Systolic BP measurement was obtained in the evening prior to polysomnography and on the following morning by a trained research assistant for resting, seated office BP measurement. The higher of the two values was used to calculate the FRS risk. Height and weight were also measured in the evening. The other risk predictor variables were obtained from the SSB medical history questionnaire completed by the participant. A ten-year risk score designated as low (<6%), intermediate (6–20%) or high (≥20%) risk for general CVD was obtained from the equation.11

Sleep Symptoms and Quality

Comprehensive symptom data were collected using standard validated questionnaires, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS),13 Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short form (FOSQ-10),14 Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI),15 SAGIC Sleep Questionnaire,16 Insomnia Severity Questionnaire (ISQ),17 and the Berlin Sleep Questionnaire.18 Total scores for the ESS, FOSQ-10 and PSQI were calculated. Additionally, twelve symptom variables (Table 1) were chosen from these questionnaires to align with previously published work investigating symptom phenotypes in OSA.19,20 Participant responses were dichotomised into “present” if they occurred at least once per week, or “absent” if they occurred less frequently or did not occur at all. Results for total scores and dichotomised variables were compared between cardiovascular groups.

Table 1 Symptom Variables Included for Analysis

Polysomnography

All polysomnography was scored using standard criteria (AASM Manual V2.6,21 with minor clarifications recommended for standardisation across Australasian sleep services).22 Polysomnographic variables in the domains of sleep architecture (sleep stages, sleep latency and efficiency), breathing disturbance (respiratory events in NREM and REM, apnoeas versus hypopnoeas), hypoxaemia (oxygen saturation, time spent below 90% oxygen saturation, oxygen desaturation index) and other (cortical arousals and periodic limb movements [PLMs]) were assessed and compared between cardiovascular groups.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi v2.3.23 Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or N (%). Continuous variables were assessed for normality of distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test and for the most part were found to have a non-parametric distribution. Polysomnographic and symptom variables were compared between those with and without established cardiovascular disease using the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables and Chi Squared test of independence for categorical variables. In those without established cardiovascular disease, polysomnographic and symptom variables were compared across FRS groups using the Independent Samples Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous data and Chi Squared tests for categorical data. Polysomnographic variables were additionally assessed using ANCOVA to adjust for age, sex and BMI. As this was an exploratory study, no adjustment for multiple comparisons was made. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05.

Results

Participant Characteristics

Of the 1062 participants recruited to the SSB at the time of analysis, 629 participants were aged between 30–74 years, had an apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI)≥ 5, and had completed the required questions for assessing cardiovascular risk. The cohort contained more males (67.7%), and the most common ethnicities were Caucasian (64.0%) and South-East Asian (9.4%). The mean age was 54.3 years (SD 11.6) and the mean BMI was 32.3 kg/m2 (SD 8.2). Forty four percent of the cohort had ever been smokers. Two hundred and forty-seven participants (39.4%) reported a diagnosis of hypertension; 238 participants (38%) reported dyslipidaemia; 98 participants (15.6%) reported presence of diabetes and 37 participants (5.9%) reported chronic lung disease.

Prevalence of Established Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Seventy seven participants (12.2%) reported established CVD, which was comprised of coronary artery disease (n=48, 7.7%), cerebrovascular disease (n=23, 3.7%), and heart failure (n=25, 4.0%). Those with established CVD were older (mean age 61 years) and had a higher BMI (mean 34.7 kg/m2) than those without CVD (53 years and 32.0 kg/m2, respectively). There was no sex difference between those with and without established CVD.

In those without established CVD (n=552), 90 participants (14.3%) had a Framingham risk score (FRS) less than 6% (“low Risk”); 244 participants (38.8%) had an FRS between 6% and 20% (“intermediate Risk”); and 218 participants (34.7%) had an FRS over 20% (“high Risk”). Low, intermediate, and high CVD risk groups differed with respect to age (40.3 years vs 51.2 years vs 61.1 years, respectively, p<0.001), sex (51% male vs 61% male vs 82% male, p<0.001), and BMI (29.1 kg/m2 vs 31.9 kg/m2 vs 33.2 kg/m2, p<0.001). The prevalence of smoking, hypertension and diabetes across groups is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Prevalence of Smoking, Hypertension and Diabetes Across Groups

Sleep Symptoms

Established Cardiovascular Disease

Presence of established CVD was not associated with significant differences in any measured symptom variable including total scores on sleep questionnaires (ESS, FOSQ-10 and PSQI) (Table 3).

Table 3 Symptom Variables: Established CVD Vs No CVD

Cardiovascular Risk Groups

Intermediate and high cardiovascular risk groups were associated with waking too early (p=0.004); however, there were no other differences for symptom variables and no significant difference for total ESS, FOSQ-10 or PSQI scores (Table 4).

Table 4 Symptom Variables: CVD Risk Groups

Polysomnographic Characteristics

Established Cardiovascular Disease

Compared to participants without CVD, participants with established CVD had a lower sleep efficiency (p<0.05); lower proportion of REM sleep (p=0.01); higher AHI (p<0.05); higher NREM AHI (p<0.05); lower REM:NREM AHI ratio (p<0.05); higher 3% oxygen desaturation index (ODI3%) (p<0.05); and a higher arousal index (p=0.02). However, none of these differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. All other polysomnographic differences between groups did not remain significant after adjusting for age and sex (see Table 5).

Table 5 Polysomnographic Variables: Established CVD Vs No CVD

Cardiovascular Risk Groups

There was a clear positive relationship between FRS and OSA severity (median AHI of 13.6/hr (IQR 18.9) in the low risk category; 18.9/hr (IQR 26.4) in the intermediate risk category; 27.6/hr (IQR 26.9) in the high risk category; p<0.001); however, this did not remain significant after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Higher CVD risk was also significantly associated with longer sleep latency (p=0.05); lower sleep efficiency (p<0.001); lower total sleep time (p=0.004); higher proportion of total sleep time spent in stage 1 sleep (p=0.006); higher NREM AHI (p<0.001); higher arousal index (p<0.001); higher PLM index (p<0.001); and a greater degree of awake and asleep hypoxia, as assessed by the time spent with oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 90% (p<0.001); ODI3% (p<0.001); average awake SpO2 (p<0.001); and nadir SpO2 (p<0.001). However, none of these differences remained significant in the adjusted analyses (see Table 6).

Table 6 Polysomnographic Variables: CVD Risk Groups

Discussion

We assessed prevalence of CVD and CVD risk at time of diagnosis of OSA in a sleep clinic population. Overall, 12.2% of those with OSA reported diagnosed CVD and a further 34.7% of the population met the FRS criteria for a high 10-year CVD risk. We sought to assess whether presence of CVD and 10-year CVD risk was associated with a particular clinical presentation in symptom profile or OSA disease characteristics on polysomnography. We found that higher FRS was associated with waking too early, which occurred at least once per week in 29.5% of the low CVD risk group, compared to 48.9% of the intermediate risk group and 49.1% of the high risk group. Polysomnography data demonstrated significant associations between increasing risk of CVD and increased OSA severity, as well as a number of polysomnographic variables including oxygen desaturation indices and sleep architecture characteristics. However, none of these associations remained statistically significant after adjusting for age, sex and BMI.

There was no evidence of a particular symptom profile that was associated with CVD or FRS groups. The exception was an increased proportion of participants waking too early in the higher FRS groups. This difference may have been due to differences in age and sex between these groups. However, insomnia symptoms have been linked to cardiovascular mortality in large prospective studies.24,25 In a recent study, comorbid insomnia and obstructive sleep apnoea, or COMISA, was associated with an increased likelihood of having cardiovascular disease at baseline.26 Interestingly, we also found an association between high CVD risk and shorter sleep efficiency and lower sleep time; however, this was not statistically significant when adjusted for age, sex and BMI.

We did not find that subjective daytime sleepiness, as measured by the ESS, differed between any of the groups. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) has been associated with increased CVD morbidity and mortality.27,28 In recent years, latent class analyses of self-reported symptoms in large cohorts of patients with moderate-to-severe OSA have consistently identified three to five symptom subtypes,19,20,29–31 which have all included core subtypes labelled “excessively sleepy”, “disturbed sleep” and “minimally symptomatic”. The replication of these subtypes across different cohorts suggest a biological basis. The “excessively sleepy” subtype in moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI>15) has been linked to increased prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular disease, including cardiovascular mortality.7,31 However, a recent study by Trzepizur et al32 did not replicate this finding in a large sleep clinic-based population; they found no association between symptom subtype and major adverse cardiac events in OSA of all severity (AHI≥5). Whilst our study was cross sectional and did not assess these recognised symptom subtypes, we also found no association between prevalent cardiovascular disease or CVD risk and sleepiness as measured by the ESS. However, there are recent data that the ESS alone may not fully capture the symptom of sleepiness.33

FRS has previously been assessed in a number of sleep populations using the laboratory test-based score (including total and HDL cholesterol values). In a sleep clinic cohort with newly diagnosed OSA in Greece, AHI modestly correlated with FRS34 which remained significant after controlling for age and BMI. That population was restricted to an age less than 65 years and excluded patients with comorbidities placing them at high CVD risk. A Chinese study35 calculating FRS in those with OSA found a correlation between AHI and ODI and time below SpO2 90% which was significant on a stepwise multivariate regression analysis. In a Brazilian study,36 FRS was calculated on a randomly sampled general (non-sleep clinic based) population who then underwent polysomnography. There was an increased prevalence of OSA across FRS groups; and as with our study there was a significant correlation between most sleep variables and high FRS; however, only a sleep efficiency of less than 85% was associated with a high FRS in the adjusted analyses. Using the office-based FRS (BMI predictor instead of laboratory cholesterol values), we also identified a clear positive relationship between FRS and AHI; however, this relationship was not significant after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. The nature of the relationship between cardiovascular risk and OSA severity is a subject of ongoing debate and may be heavily influenced by confounding common risk factors, such as obesity.37

We also showed non-significant correlations between CVD risk and polysomnographic measures of oxygen saturation, including ODI, time spent below SpO2 90% (T90), lowest SpO2, and awake average SpO2; such that those with higher CVD risk had a higher degree of hypoxia. Interestingly, this same association was not observed between these indices and presence of established CVD, with the exception of ODI. Nocturnal intermittent hypoxia has been specifically associated with CVD in population studies.8,38,39 Hypoxic burden, determined by measuring the respiratory event-related area under the desaturation curve from a pre-event baseline,40 has been strongly associated with CVD mortality, cardiovascular events and incident heart failure across populations.9,32,41,42 Whilst our study also reported more severe hypoxia with increased FRS, the association was not significant after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. This may be a consequence of common risk factors for both OSA and CVD, including age, male sex and obesity, which are included in the FRS calculation, making it difficult to determine the independent contribution to CVD from OSA.

We showed that established CVD and high CVD risk were associated with more arousals. PLMs also increased with FRS group (but not with established CVD). This same pattern was also seen in the Brazilian sleep cohort study.36 Significant PLMs have been identified as a polysomnographic subtype of OSA that has been linked with higher incident CVD and CVD-specific mortality risk.4,43 Arousals have also been shown to be independently associated with prevalent hypertension in patients with OSA.44 Although this finding was only suggestive in our population, it is in line with these previous findings of an association with CVD risk.

Limitations

This cross-sectional study of a sleep clinic population has limitations. Recruitment to the SSB is via an opt-in process, and therefore the sample may be subject to volunteer bias and may not represent the sleep clinic in its entirety. The CVD data used in this study were collected by self-report and therefore could be subject to recall bias. Our sample size may have been too small to detect significant associations between OSA and CVD given the confounding effects of age, sex and BMI. Other variables such as medication use may also mediate associations but were unmeasured in this study. Additionally, this was an observational study. By adjusting analyses for factors already included in the calculation of FRS (namely, age, sex, and BMI), we may have underestimated the significance of the correlations between the polysomnographic variables and cardiovascular risk. Finally, this study had an AHI threshold ≥ 5, which may have underestimated correlations between cardiovascular risk and both symptoms and polysomnographic variables compared to a higher threshold of ≥ 15.

Conclusions

Higher CVD risk, but not established CVD, was associated with more frequent insomnia symptoms in a multi-site sleep clinic population newly diagnosed with OSA. There were multiple variations in sleep architecture, OSA severity, oxygen desaturation, PLMs and arousals between CVD and CVD risk groups; however, these associations appeared to be due to differences in age, sex and BMI. Further research is needed to elucidate OSA phenotypic subtypes that are associated with CVD risk for the purposes of delineating personalised management strategies. The cardiovascular impact of OSA treatment, for example CPAP, in relation to such subtypes also merits exploration.

Sydney Sleep Biobank Investigators

University of Sydney - Peter Cistulli, Philip de Chazal, Kate Sutherland, Nina Sarkissian, Yu Sun Bin, Chin Moi Chow; Royal North Shore Hospital - Andrew Chan, Aimee Lowth, Jacob Graham, William Wood, Gary Cohen, Callum Bennett, Mohammad Ahmadi; Westmead Hospital - John Wheatley, Kristina Kairaitis, Stephen Lambert, Rita Ginn, Tracey Burns; Royal Price Alfred - Brendon Yee, Amanda Piper, Keith Wong, Kerri Melehan, Margaret Chan, David Wang, Gislaine Gauthier.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the work of all those that have contributed to the Sydney Sleep Biobank (SSB) data collection. The authors would additionally like to thank all the SSB participants for contributing their data to this effort.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure

Dr Andrew Chan reports personal fees from SomnoMed Limited, outside the submitted work. Dr Amanda Piper reports personal fees from Phillips, personal fees from Up to Date, outside the submitted work. Professor Peter Cistulli holds an academic chair that was funded by ResMed; also a consultant to ResMed, with fees being paid to the University; in addition reports personal fees from Somnomed, from Signifier Medical, and from Sunrise Medical, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

The abstract of this paper was presented at the Sleep Down Under Conference 2022 as a conference talk with interim findings. The abstract was published in Sleep Advances, Volume 3, Issue Supplement 1, October 2022: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpac029.011.

References

1. Benjafield A, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):687–698. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5

2. Bauters F, Rietzschel ER, Hertegonne KB, Chirinos JA. The link between obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18(1):1. doi:10.1007/s11883-015-0556-z

3. Bonsignore MR, Suarez Giron MC, Marrone O, Castrogiovanni A, Montserrat JM. Personalised medicine in sleep respiratory disorders: focus on obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosis and treatment. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(146). doi:10.1183/16000617.0069-2017

4. Zinchuk A, Yaggi HK. Phenotypic Subtypes of OSA: a challenge and opportunity for precision medicine. Chest. 2020;157(2):403–420. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.09.002

5. Zinchuk A, Gentry MJ, Concato J, Yaggi HK. Phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea: a definition, examples and evolution of approaches. Sleep Med Rev. 2017;35:113–123. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2016.10.002

6. Sutherland K, Yee BJ, Kairaitis K, Wheatley J, de Chazal P, Cistulli PA. A phenotypic approach for personalised management of obstructive sleep apnoea. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2021;1–15:2167.

7. Mazzotti DR, Keenan BT, Lim DC, Gottlieb DJ, Kim J, Pack AI. Symptom subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea predict incidence of cardiovascular outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(4):493–506. doi:10.1164/rccm.201808-1509OC

8. Zinchuk A, Jeon S, Koo BB, et al. Polysomnographic phenotypes and their cardiovascular implications in obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax. 2018;73(5):472–480. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210431

9. Azarbarzin A, Sands SA, Stone KL, et al. The hypoxic burden of sleep apnoea predicts cardiovascular disease-related mortality: the osteoporotic fractures in men study and the sleep heart health study. Eur Heart J. 2018;3:1.

10. Aurora RN, Crainiceanu C, Gottlieb DJ, Kim JS, Punjabi NM. Obstructive sleep apnea during REM sleep and cardiovascular disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(5):653–660. doi:10.1164/rccm.201706-1112OC

11. D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–753. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579

12. Sutherland K, Sarkissian N, Amis TC, et al. Sydney Sleep Biobank (SSB): development of a research resource. In Journal of Sleep Research. 2019;28:3.

13. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–545. doi:10.1093/sleep/14.6.540

14. Chasens ER, Ratcliffe SJ, Weaver TE. Development of the FOSQ-10: a short version of the functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire. Sleep. 2009;32(7):915–919. doi:10.1093/sleep/32.7.915

15. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4

16. Magalang UJ, Chen NH, Cistulli PA, et al. Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events and sleep among international sleep centers. Sleep. 2013;36(4):591–596. doi:10.5665/sleep.2552

17. Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001;2(4):297–307. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4

18. Netzer NC, Stoohs RA, Netzer CM, Clark K, Strohl KP. Using the berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(7):485. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-7-199910050-00002

19. Keenan BT, Kim J, Singh B, et al. Recognizable clinical subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea across international sleep centers: a cluster analysis. Sleep. 2018;41(3). doi:10.1093/sleep/zsx214

20. Ye L, Pien GW, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. The different clinical faces of obstructive sleep apnoea: a cluster analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1600–1607. doi:10.1183/09031936.00032314

21. Berry R, Quan S, Abreu A, et al. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Vol. 2. Darien, Illinois: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2020.

22. Jorgensen G, Downey C, Goldin J, Melehan K, Rochford P, Ruehland W. An Australasian commentary on the AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2020;18(3):163–185. doi:10.1007/s41105-020-00259-9

23. Jamovi. The Jamovi Project; 2022. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org. Accessed May 1, 2024.

24. Sofi F, Cesari F, Casini A, Macchi C, Abbate R, Gensini GF. Insomnia and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(1):57–64. doi:10.1177/2047487312460020

25. Bertisch SM, Pollock BD, Mittleman MA, et al. Insomnia with objective short sleep duration and risk of incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Sleep Heart Health Study Sleep. 2018;41:6.

26. Lechat B, Appleton S, Melaku YA, et al. The association of co‐morbid insomnia and sleep apnea with prevalent cardiovascular disease and incident cardiovascular events. J Sleep Res. 2022;31(5). doi:10.1111/jsr.13563

27. Empana JP, Dauvilliers Y, Dartigues JF, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness is an independent risk indicator for cardiovascular mortality in community-dwelling elderly: the three city study. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1219–1224. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530824

28. Gooneratne NS, Richards KC, Joffe M, et al. Sleep disordered breathing with excessive daytime sleepiness is a risk factor for mortality in older adults. Sleep. 2011;34(4):435–442. doi:10.1093/sleep/34.4.435

29. Kim J, Keenan BT, Lim DC, Lee SK, Pack AI, Shin C. Symptom-based subgroups of Koreans with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14(3):437–443. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6994

30. González KA, Tarraf W, Wallace DM, et al. Phenotypes of obstructive sleep apnea in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Sleep. 2021;44(12). doi:10.1093/sleep/zsab181

31. Labarca G, Dreyse J, Salas C, Letelier F, Jorquera J. A validation study of four different cluster analyses of OSA and the incidence of cardiovascular mortality in a Hispanic population. Chest. 2021;160(6):2266–2274. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.047

32. Trzepizur W, Blanchard M, Ganem T, et al. Sleep apnea–specific hypoxic burden, symptom subtypes, and risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(1):108–117. doi:10.1164/rccm.202105-1274OC

33. Thorarinsdottir EH, Gislason T, Pack AI, et al. Evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea across international sleep centers. Sleep. 2023;46(8). doi:10.1093/sleep/zsac271

34. Archontogeorgis K, Voulgaris A, Nena E, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract. 2018;2018:6572785. doi:10.1155/2018/6572785

35. Wang XF, Li QY, Wan HY, Li M. The influencing factors of Framingham cardiovascular risk score in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;87(31):2176–2180.

36. Cintra F, Bittencourt LR, Santos-Silva R, et al. The association between the Framingham risk score and sleep: a Sao Paulo epidemiological sleep study. Sleep Med. 2012;13(6):577–582. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2011.12.016

37. Carratù P, Di Ciaula A, Dragonieri S, et al. Relationships between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and cardiovascular risk in a naïve population of southern Italy. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(12). doi:10.1111/ijcp.14952

38. Punjabi NM, Caffo BS, Goodwin JL, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and mortality: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2009;6(8):e1000132. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000132

39. Stone KL, Blackwell TL, Ancoli-Israel S, et al. Sleep disordered breathing and risk of stroke in older community-dwelling men. Sleep. 2016;39(3):531–540. doi:10.5665/sleep.5520

40. Azarbarzin A, Sands SA, Taranto-Montemurro L, Redline S, Wellman A. Hypoxic burden captures sleep apnoea-specific nocturnal hypoxaemia. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(35):2989–2990. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz274

41. Azarbarzin A, Sands SA, Taranto-Montemurro L, et al. The sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden predicts incident heart failure. Chest. 2020;158(2):739–750. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.053

42. Labarca G, Jorquera J, Dreyse J, Salas C, Letelier F. Hypoxemic features of obstructive sleep apnea and the risk of mortality: a cluster analysis. Sleep Breathing. 2021;25(1):95–103. doi:10.1007/s11325-020-02064-7

43. Kim JW, Won TB, Rhee CS, Park YM, Yoon IY, Cho SW. Polysomnographic phenotyping of obstructive sleep apnea and its implications in mortality in Korea. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13207. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70039-5

44. Ren R, Zhang Y, Yang L, Somers VK, Covassin N, Tang X. Association between arousals during sleep and hypertension among patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(1). doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.022141

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.